Pelatihan Penyusunan Instrumen Evaluasi Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Kecakapan Abad 21

  • Imam Safi’i Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA
  • Wini Tarmini Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA
  • Andi Wibowo Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA
  • Sobri Sobri Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Keywords: 21st Century Skills, Evaluation Instruments

Abstract

TRAINING ON DEVELOPING INDONESIAN LANGUAGE EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS BASED ON 21ST CENTURY SKILLS VALUES.
This article aims to describe the training activities for the preparation of an evaluation instrument based on 21st century skill values for teachers of SDN Gandaria Selatan 01 Jakarta Selatan. An evaluation instrument based on 21st century skills values is an evaluation instrument developed based on the development of critical thinking, creative-innovative, collaborative, and communicative. The procedure used in this training activity is to use the pedagogical model of the genre, namely through the activities of building context, examining models, constructing together, and constructing independently. The technical evaluation instrument preparation was carried out using google assessment media. This training activity was able to improve the professional competence of teachers at SDN Gandaria Selatan 01 Jakarta Selatan in developing evaluation instruments based on 21st century skill values.

References

Arifin, Z. (2017). Mengembangkan instrumen pengukur critical thinking skills siswa pada pembelajaran matematika abad 21. Theorems (The Original Research of Mathematics), 1(2), 92-100.

Bensley, D. A., Rainey, C., Murtagh, M. P., Flinn, J. A., Maschiocchi, C., Bernhardt, P. C., & Kuehne, S. (2016). Closing the assessment loop on critical thinking: The challenges of multidimensional testing and low test-taking motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 158-168.

Carter, A. G., Creedy, D. K., & Sidebotham, M. (2017a). Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection). Midwifery, 54, 73-80.

Carter, A. G., Creedy, D. K., & Sidebotham, M. (2017b). Critical thinking skills in midwifery practice: Development of a self-assessment tool for students. Midwifery, 50, 184-192.

Chang, H. Y., Chen, J. H., Chang, J. H., Lin, H. C., Lin, C. Y., & Peng, C. C. (2017). Multiple strains probiotics appear to be the most effective probiotics in the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis and mortality: An updated meta-analysis. PloS One, 12(2), e0171579.

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking skills and Creativity, 12, 43-52.

Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2018). Are teachers' implicit theories of creativity related to the recognition of their students' creativity?. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(2), 156-167.

Haugwitz, M., Nesbit, J. C., & Sandmann, A. (2010). Cognitive ability and the instructional ef fi cacy of collaborative concept mapping. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 536-543.

Heijltjes, A., van Gog, T., Leppink, J., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving critical thinking: Effects of dispositions and instructions oneconomics students’ reasoning skills. Learning and Instruction, 29, 31-42

Herrera-Pavo, M. Á. (2021). Collaborative learning for virtual higher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100437.

Horkoff, J., Maiden, N. A., & Asboth, D. (2019). Creative goal modeling for innovative requirements. Information and software Technology, 106, 85-100.

Lin, G. Y. (2020). Scripts and mastery goal orientation in face-to-face versus computer-mediated collaborative learning: Influence on performance, affective and motivational outcomes, and social ability. Computers & Education, 143, 103691.

Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (1992). Tiga undang-undang: Perkeretaapian, lalu lintas, dan angkutan jalan penerbangan tahun 1992. Jakarta: Eko Jaya.

Nahmoud, I., Vasquez, J. G., Cho, H., Dennis-Tiwary, T., & Likhtik, E. (2021). Salient safety conditioning improves novel discrimination learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 397, 112907.

National Education Association. (2002). Preparing 21st Century Students for a Global Society : An Educator’s Guide to the “Four Cs”. Retrieved April 1, 2021 From https://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A- Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf.

Nguyen, H. (2012). Social interaction and competence development: Learning the structural organization of a communicative practice. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(2), 127-142.

Pristiwati, R. (2019). Tantangan rancangan pembelajaran dalam era kompetensi abad 21 untuk meningkatkan kemampuan keprofesionalan dan mengelola pembelajaran bermakna. Jurnal Abdimas, 23(2), 125-127.

Pandey, A., Gupta, V., & Gupta, R. K. (2019). Spirituality and innovative behavior in teams: Examining the mediating role of team learning. Bangalore: IIMB Management Review.

Prayogi, R. D. (2019). Kecakapan abad 21: Kompetensi digital pendidik masa depan. Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(2), 144-151.

Shaari, R., Mahmud, N., Wahab, S. R. A., Rahim, K. A., Rajab, A., & Panatik, S. A. (2012). Deep as a learning approach in inspiring creative and innovative minds among postgraduate students in research university. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 152-156.

Safi’i, I., Tarmini, W., & Ilyas, H. P. (2020). Learning a factual text genre: An Analysis of the secondary high school teachers’ abilities in developing learning devices. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 10(2), 222-232.

Stupple, E. J. N., Maratos, F. A., Elander, J., Hunt, T. E., Cheung, K. Y. F., & Aubeeluck, A. V. (2017). Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): A measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 91-100.

Sutanto, P. (2019). Panduan implementasi kecakapan abad 21 kurikulum 2013 di sekolah menengah atas. Jakarta: PSMA Ditjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Wibowo, W. S. (2014). Implementasi model project based learning (PJBL) dalam pembelajaran sains untuk membangun 4Cs skills peserta didik sebagai bekal dalam menghadapi tantangan abad 21. In Seminar Nasional IPA V tahun 2014 (Scientific Learning dalam Konten dan Konteks Kurikulum 2013) (pp. 275-285).

van der Wilt, F., van der Veen, C., van Kruistum, C., & van Oers, B. (2018). Why can’t I join? Peer rejection in early childhood education and the role of oral communicative competence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 247-254.

Wu, L., Liu, Q., Mao, G., & Zhang, S. (2020). Using epistemic network analysis and self-reported reflections to explore students' metacognition differences in collaborative learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 82, 101913.

Yan, X., Zhai, L., & Fan, W. (2013). C-index: A weighted network node centrality measure for collaboration competence. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 223-239.

Yan, H., Hu, L., Xiang, X., Liu, Z., & Yuan, X. (2021). PPCL: Privacy-preserving collaborative learning for mitigating indirect information leakage. Information Sciences, 548, 423-437.

Yang, Z., Zhou, Y., Chung, J. W., Tang, Q., Jiang, L., & Wong, T. K. (2018). Challenge Based Learning nurtures creative thinking: An evaluative study. Nurse Education Today, 71, 40-47.

Zillmer, N., & Kuhn, D. (2018). Do similar-ability peers regulate one another in a collaborative discourse activity?. Cognitive Development, 45, 68-76.

Published
2021-08-06
How to Cite
Safi’i, I., Tarmini, W., Wibowo, A., & Sobri, S. (2021). Pelatihan Penyusunan Instrumen Evaluasi Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Kecakapan Abad 21. Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 6(3), 881-891. https://doi.org/10.30653/002.202163.799
Section
Articles