Pengenalan Computational Thinking untuk Guru-guru di Kabupaten Purwakarta
Abstract
COMPUTATIONAL THINKING INTRODUCTION FOR TEACHERS IN PURWAKARTA.
The changing needs of the industrial world must always be responded quickly by the world of education. The needs of the industrial world change along with technological developments. Currently, the industry has entered the 4.0 era or better known as the digital industry. Today’s society only views computers only as tools, not as a science to educate, even negative when viewed from media notifications that report many cases of technology abuse. This causes parents to tend to limit their children’s use of technology. If children who incidentally are the future of the nation are limited or even prohibited from using technology, of course Indonesia will not be able to compete in the digital era of industry. This mindset must be straightened out, that the computer is not only a tool but also a benchmark for thinking patterns. Community service activities will take place in Purwakarta district in the form of counseling and learning Computational Thinking. Beginning with a face-to-face seminar with lecture learning methods, and questions and answers. After the teachers received counseling, then we facilitated their students to test their computational thinking skills through the Bebras Challenge, in collaboration with the NBO Bebras Indonesia.
References
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?. Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.
Buitrago Flórez, F., Casallas, R., Hernández, M., Reyes, A., Restrepo, S., & Danies, G. (2017). Changing a generation’s way of thinking: Teaching computational thinking through programming. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 834-860.
Chiasson, M. (2017). Characteristics of learning spaces favouring the development of computational thinking skills. Moncton: Université de Moncton.
Bebras. (n.y). Bebras computational thinking challenge. Tersedia: http://bebras.co.id.
Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145-157.
DiSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Denning, P. J., & Freeman, P. A. (2009). The profession of IT Computing's paradigm. Communications of the ACM, 52(12), 28-30.
Hikmawan, R., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Development of Performance Assessment Telecommunications Expertise based on KKNI to support Vocational Competencies Achievement. In 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018) (pp. 265-268). Atlantis Press.
Hikmawan, R., Suherman, A., Fauzi, A., & Mubarak, I. (2020). Ikigai as student high order literacy skills intrinsic motivation learning Template. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(1), 98-102.
Hikmawan, R., Suherman, A., Majid, N. A., & Ridwan, T. (2020, March). Ensuring CT with three-dimentional integrated assessment. In International Conference on Elementary Education (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 195-201).
Israel, M., Pearson, J. N., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q. M., & Reese, G. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263-279.
Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., ... & Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 32-37.
Swaid, S. I. (2015). Bringing computational thinking to STEM education. Procedia Manufacturing. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.761.
Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why. The Link Magazine, Spring. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.
Copyright (c) 2021 Rizki Hikmawan, Dian Permata Sari, Suprih Widodo, Dimas Setiawan, Muhammad Irwan Ramadhan, Sadam Fauzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
