Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru melalui Sosialisasi dan Workshop Model Pembelajaran RADEC Berorientasi Multiliterasi
TEACHER COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH SOCIALIZATION AND MULTILITERATION ORIENTED RADEC LEARNING MODEL WORKSHOP.
This study was conducted on teachers in Ciamis Regency, which examined the attitudes, knowledge and skills of teachers as well as how the teacher competency training needs. Implementation of teacher competency training which is conducted to facilitate teachers in planning, implementing and evaluating multiliterative oriented learning. The teacher competency development workshop was attended by 70 teachers from various elementary schools in Ciamis district. In the workshop activities, various learning issues were explained in the era 4.0 and society 5.0 and learning models that can facilitate various 21st century skills including multiliterative learning. The teacher competency development workshop can support them to overcome the challenges they face during their teaching practice. The data shows that there is a very high need for training that can assist teachers in mastering various teaching skills, especially in facilitating multiliteracy-oriented learning. Some data also show about the teacher's lack of understanding of the learning model. There are also data results that show a lack of student involvement in multiteracy activities both in learning and given assignments. This is reinforced by the low percentage of teaching activities that involve students in higher order thinking skills.
Carless, D. (2013). Sustainable feedback and the development of student self-evaluative capacities. In S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless, & Taras, M. (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: Developing dialogue with students (pp. 113-122). Abingdon, UK: Routledge..
Gao, X. (2015). Promoting experiential learning in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(4), 435-438.
Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 69-95.
Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20-34.
Koh, K. H. (2011). Improving teachers’ assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22(3), 255-276.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as a source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 707-734.
Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2014). Assessment as learning in the language classroom. Assessment as learning. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology.
Newby, P. (2014). Research methods for education. 2nd ed. Oxon: Routledge.
Price, H. E., & Weatherby, K. (2018). The global teaching profession: how treating teachers as knowledge workers improves the esteem of the teaching profession. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(1), 113-149.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
Van der Meijden, H., & Veenman, S. (2005). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting. Computers in Human behavior, 21(5), 831-859.
Copyright (c) 2020 Wahyu Sopandi, Muh Erwinto Imran, Hany Handayani, Chaerun Anwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.